Free Reproducibles
(Re)designing Argumentation Writing Units for Grades 5–12
Discover how to establish engaging argumentation units of instruction that empower students to present and convince others of their position.
Benefits:
- Examine the characteristic elements of an argument and the benefits of teaching students to work through how to structure an argument.
- Examine an argumentation unit map, its learning goals and guiding questions, and then develop one of your own.
- Complete exercises throughout the book that will help to create a comprehensive argumentation unit of instruction.
- Design a full lesson on argumentation, from establishing author’s purpose, to supporting a thesis with evidence, to presenting counter arguments.
- Download templates, checklists, rubrics, and student activities useful for designing an argumentation unit and guiding lessons.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Examining the Fundamentals of Argumentation
Chapter 2: Building an Argumentation Unit Map
Chapter 3: Formulating a Pre- and Culminating Assessment and Establishing Criteria for Success
Chapter 4: Writing Engaging Introductions Using Gradual Release of Responsibility
Chapter 5: Designing Lessons
Appendix A: List of Figures and Tables
Appendix B: Professional and Student Resources
REPRODUCIBLES
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
- Figure 2.1: Unit-Planning Components of Backward Design
- Figure 2.2: Unit Map Template
- Table 2.1: Argumentation Unit Map—KUDs and Guiding Questions
Chapter 3
- Figure 3.3: Argument Student Writing Checklist
- Figure 3.4: Argument Audience Checklist
- Figure 3.5: Orienting Students to a Writing Checklist
- Figure 3.6: Argument Writing Rubric
Chapter 4
- Figure 4.1: Cards for Modeling Engaging Introductions
- Figure 4.2: Introduction Examples
- Figure 4.3: Options for Engaging Readers
Chapter 5
- Figure 5.1: Text Excerpts for Author’s Purpose Activity
- Figure 5.2: Sentence Strips for Thesis Activity
- Figure 5.3: Sample Thesis Statements for an Argument
- Figure 5.4: Common Subordinating Conjunctions
- Figure 5.5: Elaboration Practice—Obesity
- Figure 5.6: Elaboration Practice—Minimum Legal Drinking Age
- Figure 5.7: Counterargument Sentence Frames 1
- Figure 5.8: Counterargument Sentence Frames 2
- Figure 5.9: Counterargument Examples
- Figure 5.10: Socratic Discussion Peer Observation Form
- Figure 5.11: Prewriting Suggestions
- Figure 5.12: Argumentative Revision Sheet
- Figure 5.13: Feedback Sheet for an Argument
SUGGESTED RESOURCES
Books
- Glass, K. T. (2017). The Fundamentals of (Re)designing Writing Units. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press
- Marzano, R. J. (in press). The New Art and Science of Teaching: A Framework for Change. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press
Websites
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
- 6+1 Trait Rubrics
- Achieve the Core’s “Argument/Opinion Writing: On-Demand”
- Achieve the Core’s “Student Writing Samples”
- Literacy Design Collaborative’s Resources
- Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity’s K–12 performance tasks across content areas
Chapter 5
- Adverb Clauses Are Subordinate Clauses
- “Author’s Purpose Commercials” by Amanda Spence
- Debatepedia
- Google differentiated search lessons
- Harvard College Writing Center
- “Mrs. Collar’s Author’s Purpose” by Nicole Collar
- The New Canaan High School Writing Center
- On Demand Instruction
- ProCon.org
- “Scaffolding for Socratic Seminar”
- “Socratic Seminar: The ‘N-Word’”
- “Socratic Seminar: Patience & Practice”
- “Socratic Seminar: Supporting Claims and Counterclaims”
- Teaching Channel
- What Is a Subordinate Clause?
- The Writing Center at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
General Writing
- Brown’s Student Learning Tools “Argumentation Help!”
- Dartmouth’s “Institute for Writing and Rhetoric”:
- Duke (University) Thompson Writing Program
- Google differentiated search lessons
- Harvard College Writing Center
- National Geographic Graphic Organizers Collection
- Purdue University Online Writing Lab
- University of Washington’s (Tacoma) “Teaching and Learning Center”
- The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill
Argumentation Topics
- Debatepedia
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “192 Questions for Writing or Discussion”
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “200 Prompts for Argumentative Writing”
- ProCon.org
Thesis Statements
- Grammar-Monster.com’s “What Is a Subordinate Clause?”
- Grammar Revolution’s “The Subordinate Clause”
- On Demand Instruction
- ProCon.org
- The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill “Thesis Statements”
Performance Assessment Tasks
- K–12 performance tasks across content areas
- LDC module templates for elementary and grades 6–12
- LDC science argument prompts and student work for middle school
- Performance Assessment Resource Bank
- Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction collection of K–12 informational and argumentation assessment prompts and rubrics for civics, economics, geography, history, and international perspectives
Student Writing Models
- Achieve the Core’s Student Writing Samples
- Brown’s Student Learning Tools
- Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects: Appendix C—Samples of Student Writing
- Holt, Rinehart and Winston’s Holt Online Essay Scoring—Writing Prompts:
- Literacy Design Collaborative’s Student Work Samples
- New York Times’s The Learning Network student contests and student contest winners
Oregon Department of Education’s Writing Scored Student Work:
- Grade 5
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
- Grade 8
- High school
- Oregon State University: Writing 121’s argument sample essays and web resources
- Thoughtful Learning
Rubrics
- 6+1 Trait Rubrics
- Edutopia’s Resources for Using Rubrics in the Middle Grades
- Kathy Schrock’s Guide to Everything: Assessment and Rubrics
- Literacy Design Collaborative’s Student Work Rubrics
- Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, State of Washington: Social Studies—OSPI-Developed Assessments for Social Studies
- RubiStar
- University of Wisconsin-Stout’s “Rubrics for Assessment”
- What Are Rubrics and Why Are They Important?
Calibrating to Score Student Work
- The Rhode Island Department of Education’s “Writing Calibration Protocol”
- Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, & Equality’s “Semi-Structured Calibration Activity”
Peer Review
- Calibrated Peer Review
- Eli Review
- Peerceptiv
- PeerMark
- “The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes”
Published Works
- Detroit Free Press
- The Miami Herald
- National Geographic
- Newsela
- New York Times
- New York Times articles by Nicholas Kristof
- New York Times’s The Learning Network
- ProCon.org
- Slate
- Sports Illustrated
- Time for Kids
- Upfront Magazine
- USA Today
- The Week
Unit and Lesson Examples
- “Analyzing Famous Speeches as Arguments”
- Digital Docs in a Box
- EngageNY
- “English Language Arts Guidebook Units”
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “For the Sake of Argument: Writing Persuasively to Craft Short, Evidence-Based Editorials”
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “Skills Practice: Persuading an Audience Using Logos, Pathos and Ethos”
- Project Exchange
- Stanford History Education Group’s “Reading Like a Historian (Grades 9–12)”
- Stanford University’s “Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts”
Organizations and Associations
- International Literacy Association
- National Council of Teachers of English
- National Writing Project
- ReadWriteThink
- Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, & Equity
Videos to Teach Argument
- TeachingChannel’s “Evidence & Arguments: Lesson Planning (Grades 9–10)”
- TeachingChannel’s “Read, Discuss, Debate: Evaluating Arguments (Grades 9–12)”
Socratic Method